Image Source: Victory Girls Blog
As Jonathan Turley explains, “Articles of impeachment were not meant to be articles of barter. Just as the House elected not to seek to compel the testimony of critical witnesses, the Senate can make the same decision for its own house.”
Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz agrees. “It’s an unconstitutional gambit and it won’t work… It would be like indicting someone and then just not having a trial and letting the charges sit there unresolved.”
If she doesn’t move the articles to the Senate, he feels the impeachment should be struck as void.
Civil rights attorney Harvey Silvergate disagrees that it’s unconstitutional, but he did describe her move as “kind of bizarre” and labeled it a “manipulation of the system.”
“This is sort of the Wild West…”
One thing for sure – this stalling tactic contradicts one of the major talking points of the Democratic narrative.
What happened to the “time is of the essence” rush?
Where are all of the fears about a “crime spree in progress.”
Something doesn’t line up.
Looks like we’re in for another one of those Constitutional Crises she’s always raving about. This time, she’s at the helm.
What do you think?
Is it Constitutional or Unconstitutional?
Read more here.